Comparative Analysis between Conventional Plaster Models and Digital Models in the Accuracy of Prosthetic Adaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v8i18.1976Palavras-chave:
Conventional models, Digital templates, Prosthetic fitting, PrecisionResumo
The comparison between conventional plaster cast models and digital models in the accuracy of prosthetic fitting is a relevant topic in modern dentistry. Several studies have shown that digital models, obtained by intraoral scanning, have advantages in terms of accuracy, processing time, and patient satisfaction over conventional plaster models. While both methods can be effective, digital models offer greater flexibility, allowing for better fitting of prostheses, with fewer impression errors and greater reproducibility. However, it is important to consider the variations that may occur depending on the scanning technique and the region of the dental arch, which can influence the final results. This study aims to analyze the benefits and limitations of each method, in order to offer a clear orientation for dental professionals in choosing the best technique for prosthetic fitting.
Downloads
Referências
Costa, A., Silva, B., & Oliveira, C. (2022). Financial challenges in implementing digital technologies in dental clinics. Journal of Dental Technology , 15(1), 39-45. Available at: https://jdt.com/desafios-financeiros-tecnologias-digitais/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Choi, J.-W., Ahn, J.-J., Son, K., & Huh, J.-B. (2019). Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models. Materials , 12(21), 3499. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/21/3499 [Accessed: 24 March. 2025].
Chandran, S.K., et al. (2019). Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Dentistry: A Rapid Review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 13(4), ZE01-ZE06. Available at: https://www.jcdr.net/ReadXMLFile.aspx?id=12756 [ Accessed: 24 Mar. 2025].
Dental Speed. (2023). Intraoral Scanner: main advantages and models. Available at : https://blog.dentalspeed.com/scanner-intraoral-principais-vantagens-e-modelos/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025 ].
Eapgoias. (2023). Intraoral Scanning: What Does the Dentist Need to Know? eapgoias . Available at: https://eapgoias.com.br/escaneamento-intraoral/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Giménez, B., Özcan, M., Martínez-Rus, F., & Pradíes, G. (2015). The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research , 26(4), 447-452. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/clr.13273 [Accessed: 24 Mar. 2025].
Guedes, M., Lima, AC, & Silva, L. (2021). The influence of digital scans on prosthetic outcomes. J Prosthet Dent , 125(4), 505-511. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.14315 [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Gondim Moura, I. (2020). The use of intraoral scanner in dentistry: literature review. Available at: https://www.unirv.edu.br/conteudos/fckfiles/files/ISADORA%20GONDIM%20MOURA.pdf [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Launca Dental. (n.d.). Training and education for intraoral scanners: what dentists need to know. Launca Dental . Available at: https://www.launcadental.com/pt/blog/training-and-education-for-intraoral-scanners-what-dentists-need-to-know/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Lima, AC, & Silva, L. (2020). Patient comfort and preference in digital versus conventional impressions. Journal of Dentistry , 98, 201-207. Available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-dentistry [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Mehta, S. B., Bronkhorst, E. M., Crins, L., Huysmans, M.-CDNJ, Wetselaar, P., & Loomans, BAC (2021). A comparative evaluation between the reliability of gypsum casts and digital grayscale intra-oral scans for the scoring of tooth wear using the Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES). Journal of Oral Rehabilitation , 48(9), 678–686. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34036684/ [Accessed: 24 Mar. 2025].
Nogueira, T. (2023). Intraoral Scanner Price: what to consider before buying one! Aditek . Available at: https://aditek.com.br/blog/scanner-intraoral-preco/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Oliveira, JR, & Pereira, MS (2021). Digital workflows in prosthodontics: Advances and challenges. Journal of Prosthodontics , 30(2), 127-133 Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1532-849x [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Pereira, MS, Costa, RV, & Souza, F. (2020). Accuracy of intraoral scanners in prosthodontic applications. J Prosthodontic Res , 64(1), 43-50 . Available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-prosthodontic-research [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Pereira, MS, & Lima, D. (2022). Effect of impression technique on the accuracy of prosthetic models. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry , 122(1), 102-110. Available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-prosthetic-dentistry [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Pereira, M., & Lima, R. (2022). Accessibility and cost in the adoption of digital technologies in dentistry. Digital Dentistry Journal , 10(3), 112-115. Available at: https://revistadigitalodontologia.com.br/acessibilidade-custo-tecnologias-digitais/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Strasding, M., Marchand, L., Merino, E., Zarauz, C., & Pitta, J. (2024). Material and abutment selection for CAD/CAM implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients – A narrative review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 35(8), 984-999. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38864592/ [Accessed: 24 Mar. 2025].
SAS Equipment. (2023). The Digital Dentistry Revolution: Technology and Efficiency. Available at: https://sasequipamento.com.br/revolucao-odontologia-digital-tecnologia-eficiencia/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025
Silva, J. (2022). Financial Viability of Digital Dentistry. ImplantNewsPerio . Available at: https://implantnewsperio.com.br/odontologia-digital-qual-a-viabilidade-financeira/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Zhermack. (2023). Gypsum models vs 3D models that can be printed. Zhermack Magazine . Available at: https://magazine.zhermack.com/en/laboratory-en/gypsum-models-vs-3d-printed-models/ [Accessed: March 24, 2025].
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
ARK
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
