SOCIAL CANVAS: TECHNOLOGY TO MODEL THE MISSION AND THE IMPACTS OF THE THIRD SECTOR

Authors

Keywords:

BUSINESS MODEL Canvas. SOCIAL MODEL Canvas. THIRD SECTOR. SOCIAL IMPACT.

Abstract

Use of Canvas models, such as Business Model Canvas, plays an important role in business organizations and startups. Social Canvas, as it is being elaborated and practiced abroad, is one way to present the model of an organization that impacts socially. There is also a literature of the Canvas model mainly about companies with social impact that does not cover all social impacts activities of organizations and all organizations engaged. The paper proposes to compare some models and appreciates  social canvas analysis for third sector organizations organizational models. Are encountered some emerging initiatives, hybrid models and practices in Brazil that have to be supported with theoretical framework. This is a goal of the work. The results of the analysis were successfully applied in a civil society organization explaining clearly its mission and its activities with social impacts. The conclusion of the research is that the Social Canvas needs to use different typologies by social organizations that have different missions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alessandro Aveni, Universidade de Brasília, UnB, DF, Brasil.

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0679425851663633
Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-6818
E-mail: alessandro@unb.br


References

ALEX NICHOLLS Social Entrepreneurship New Models of Sustainable Social Change Edited by Oxford Press . 2006

BLANK S. The Four Steps to the Epiphany. Ed. Lulu.com 2006 3ª ed.

BORNSTEIN, David. How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas. Oxford University Press 2004.

BRASIL Lei nº 9.790, de 23 de março de 1999.

______ Lei nº 13.019, de 31 de Julho de 2014

DEFOURNY J., NYSSENS M., Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments, in “Social Enterprise Journal”, Vol. 4, 3. 2008.

DRAYTON B. The social entrenpreneur. 1972.

DRUCKER, P. Innovation and entrepreneurship Practice and Principles Harper&Row. New York 1985.

_________. Managing non profit organization. Harper e Collins. 1990.

_________. What Business Can Learn from Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, Jul/Aug89, Vol. 67(4): 88-93. 1989.

_________. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles 1985

HART S.L Capitalism at the Crossroads Wharton School Publishing, 2005.

LEADBEATER, C. The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Demos, 1997.

M. YUNUS The banker to the poor United States: PublicAffairs 1999.

OSBORNE, S. P.. The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges, London: Routledge.2008.

OSTERWALDER A. The Business Model Ontology - A Proposition In a Design Science Approach PhD thesis University of Lausanne 2004. http://www.hec.unil.ch/aosterwa/PhD/Osterwalder_PhD_BM_Ontology.pdf.

PORTER, M.E. & Kramer, M.R. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, December, pp. 78–92. 2006.

PRAHALAD, C.K "The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid" (Wharton School Publishing, 2004.

SINGER P. Introdução à Economia Solidária. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2002.

SALAMON, L.M., AND ANHEIER, H.K. (eds.). Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1997.

SEBRAE. Referenciais para uma nova práxis educacional. Brasília: Sebrae, 2001.

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

AVENI, A. . SOCIAL CANVAS: TECHNOLOGY TO MODEL THE MISSION AND THE IMPACTS OF THE THIRD SECTOR. JRG Journal of Academic Studies, Brasil, São Paulo, v. 1, n. 2, p. 27–53, 2018. Disponível em: https://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/18. Acesso em: 4 dec. 2024.