Prosthetic screw retention in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v9i20.3036Keywords:
Dental Implants, Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis, Preload, Mechanical Complications, All-on-4 ConceptAbstract
Prosthetic screw retention represents a critical factor for the mechanical stability and long-term success of full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept. Preload loss resulting from tribological phenomena and functional biomechanical loading is considered one of the main causes of prosthetic screw loosening in this treatment modality. This study aimed to critically analyze scientific evidence regarding factors associated with prosthetic screw retention in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations published over the last ten years. A qualitative narrative literature review was conducted. The bibliographic search was performed between November 2025 and January 2026 using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases, employing descriptors related to the All-on-4 protocol, preload maintenance, screw loosening, angled screw channels, and mechanical complications. After applying eligibility criteria, 18 studies were included in the final analysis. The findings indicate that prosthetic screw stability depends on both preload magnitude and maintenance, being influenced by friction coefficient, screw surface treatment, settling effect, implant angulation, distal cantilever extension, and passive fit accuracy of the prosthetic framework. Laboratory evidence suggests improved reverse torque maintenance with tribological surface modifications; however, long-term prospective clinical studies remain limited. It can be concluded that prosthetic screw retention in the All-on-4 protocol is multifactorial, requiring an integrated biomechanical approach involving proper torque application, occlusal control, accurate prosthetic fit, and periodic clinical monitoring to minimize mechanical complications and enhance treatment predictability.
Downloads
References
COLPAK, E.; GUMUS, H. Effect of surface modifications of abutment screws on reverse torque values: an in vitro study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 33, n. 4, p. 401–409, 2020.
DE MOURA, M. B. et al. Influence of screw surface treatment on retention of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Journal of Oral Implantology, v. 43, n. 4, p. 254–260, 2017.
GREER, A. et al. Mechanical complications associated with angled screw channel restorations. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 30, n. 3, p. 258–259, 2017.
JUNG, R. E. et al. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 23, supl. 6, p. 2–21, 2012.
KIM, B. H. et al. Complication rates for various retention types in anterior implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 125, n. 2, p. 273–278, 2021.
MALÓ, P. et al. All-on-4 concept for full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxillae: a 5- to 13-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, v. 21, n. 4, p. 538–549, 2019.
MARTIN, W. C. et al. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 86, n. 1, p. 24–32, 2001.
SANINNO, G. All-on-four concept: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Oral Implantology, v. 41, n. 2, p. 163–171, 2015.
SWAMIDASS, R. S. et al. Abutment screw torque changes with straight and angled screw-access channels. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 125, n. 4, p. 675–681, 2020.
ŞENTÜRK, A. et al. Biomechanical behavior of the all-on-4 concept and alternative implant configurations: a finite element analysis. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, v. 10, 2024.
THEOHARIDOU, A. et al. Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations: a systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 101, n. 1, p. 28–34, 2009.
VERMA, A. et al. Mechanical failures of dental implants and supported prostheses: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 15, n. 3, p. e305–e315, 2023.
JÖRNÉUS, L.; JEMT, T.; CARLSSON, L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, v. 7, n. 3, p. 353–359, 1992.





































