Digital sensitivity. The human being, artificial intelligence (AI), and new technologies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v9i20.3028

Keywords:

Digital sensitivity, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Human–machine interaction, Ontology of technology, Embodied cognition, Industry 5.0, Socio-technical systems, Philosophy of AI, Digital prosthesis

Abstract

Contemporary debates on artificial intelligence and human–machine interaction largely interpret technological development through functionalist and computational frameworks. Within these paradigms, cognition is treated as information processing and digital augmentation as the optimization or extension of pre-existing human faculties. Perception, in particular, is assumed to be a stable biological substrate that technology can enhance without fundamentally altering. Prevailing accounts rarely address how digital infrastructures reorganize the conditions under which reality becomes perceptible, meaningful, and actionable. By focusing on efficiency, performance, and “human-centric innovation” (as in the rhetoric surrounding Industry 5.0), current models risk obscuring the socio-historical and political mediation of sensitivity. This article introduces the concept of digital sensitivity to reconceptualize perception as a situated and historically mediated mode of world-disclosure rather than a discrete sensory function. The paper argues that the progressive integration of AI systems, distributed sensing networks, and digital platforms amounts to the emergence of a virtual artificial sense—an infrastructural layer of mediation that precedes and orients individual awareness. This development does not simply extend biological capacities; it transforms the structure of subjectivity and redefines how humans orient themselves within the world. The human–machine relation must therefore be understood as a process of co-constitution rather than augmentation. Reframing digital technologies as ontological mediators rather than neutral instruments has significant consequences for debates on agency, responsibility, and governance. Recognizing this shift allows us to move beyond polarized narratives of technological optimism or dystopia and toward a deeper reflection on how digitally saturated environments reshape human existence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alessandro Aveni, Universidade de Brasília, UnB, DF, Brasil

Bacharel em Administração e Mestre em Geografia pela Universidade de Brasília-UnB, Doutor em Ciências Políticas pela Universidade Statale de Milano e em Administração pela Universidade Cormerciale Luigi Bocconi di Milano ambas na Itália. Possui também Especialização em Estratégia Empresarial pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas-FGV.

References

Aristotle. (1994). Aristotle’s De anima. Brill.

Assobiotec – Osservatori Digital Innovation, Politecnico di Milano. (2025). Il biotech in Italia: Numeri, storie e trend [Report].

Aveni, A. (2017). Avaliação de patentes e inovação: Métodos e problemas. Cadernos de Prospecção, 10(4), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v10i4.23018

Aveni, A. (2023). Industry 5.0 and Industry 4.0 comparative definitions. Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros, 14(46), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8045181

Aveni, A. (2024a). The 10th WIPO conversation on intellectual property (IP) and frontier technologies. Revista Coleta Scientifica. https://zenodo.org/records/14509088

Aveni, A. (2024b). Define artificial intelligence outcomes as intellectual property collective right. Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros, 15, 1–18.https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1236.

Aveni, A. (2025). Extended mind theory discussion paper: The next-generation mindset. Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16847223

Aveni, A. (2025b).The New Artificial Intelligence (AI) Italian Regulation approved on 17th of September 2025. A Discussion. Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros, Ano 16, Vol. XVI, n.51, jul.-dez., 2025. https://doi.org/0.5281/zenodo.17437956

Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 196–223). Routledge.

Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chen, H., & Jin, Q. (2009). Ubiquitous personal study: A framework for supporting information access and sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13, 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0221-z

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emozione e coscienza. Adelphi.

Di Somma, A. (2017). Metafisica e Lichtung nel pensiero di Martin Heidegger. Armando.

Eco, U. (2015). How to write a thesis (C. Farina & G. Farina, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1977)

EY & Assobiotec-Federchimica. (2025). Settore biotech: Innovazione tecnologica e domanda di lavoro [Report].

Fallatah, K. U., Barhamgi, M., & Perera, C. (2023). Personal data stores (PDS): A review. Sensors, 23(3), 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031477

Floridi, L. (2022). Etica dell’intelligenza artificiale: Sviluppi, opportunità, sfide. Raffaello Cortina.

Foucault, M. (1998). Discipline, poteri, verità: Detti e scritti 1970–1984 (M. Bertani & V. Zini, Eds.). Marietti. (Original work published 1970)

Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200–209.

Ghorbani Pashakolaie, V., Gonella, S., & Muhit, I. B. (2025). Integrating modern bioeconomy into macroeconomics: A comprehensive review of impacts and interactions. Bioresource Technology Reports, 30, 102125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102125

Gillings, M. R., Hilbert, M., & Kemp, D. J. (2016). Information in the biosphere: Biological and digital worlds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.12.013

Hughes, J. (2018). Human augmentation and the age of the transhuman. In T. J. Prescott, N. Lepora, & P. F. M. J. Verschure (Eds.), Living machines: A handbook of research in biomimetic and biohybrid systems. Oxford University Press.

Kelsey, S. (2022). Intelligibility, insight, and intelligence. In C. Cohoe (Ed.), Aristotle’s On the Soul: A critical guide (pp. 211–228). Cambridge University Press.

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Blackwell.

Lee, C. P., Dourish, P., & Mark, G. (2006). The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. In Proceedings of the 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 483–492).

Luu, D. K., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence enables real-time and intuitive control of prostheses via nerve interface. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 69(10), 3051–3063. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2022.3160618

Madsen, E. L., & Slåtten, T. (2023). Industry 5.0: Human–machine collaboration for sustainable and resilient production. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(2), 217–235.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. Landes, Trans.). Routledge.

Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11, 4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371

Preti, S., Caserta, G., De Michieli, L., Boccardo, N., & Di Bella, E. (2025). The socio-economic impact of robotic prosthetics: The Hannes hand case study. Scientific Reports, 15, 32788. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-15652-y

Ray, T. S. (1992). Evolution, ecology and optimization of digital organisms (SFI Working Paper No. 1992-08-042). Santa Fe Institute.

Russell, B. (1982). La visione scientifica del mondo (E. A. G. Loliva, Trans.). Laterza.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Simon & Schuster.

Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster.

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.

Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Pensiero e linguaggio. Laterza. (Original work published 1934)

Wiener, N. (2019). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

AVENI, A. Digital sensitivity. The human being, artificial intelligence (AI), and new technologies. JRG Journal of Academic Studies, Brasil, São Paulo, v. 9, n. 20, p. e093026, 2026. DOI: 10.55892/jrg.v9i20.3028. Disponível em: https://revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/3028. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2026.

ARK