Cultural factors that interfere with experiences about immunization against Covid-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v7i15.1441Keywords:
COVID-19, Cultural factors, ImmunizationAbstract
Introduction: Known as the novel coronavirus, the SARS-CoV-2 variant responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic was detected on December 31 in Wuhan, China; a few days later, on January 9, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed the circulation of the new variant. On January 16, the first importation into Japanese territory was confirmed. From then on, the virus began to spread globally, causing panic, fear, and concern in the world population due to the high number of infected and dead that grew disproportionately as the virus circulated in several countries. Objective: To identify in the literature which cultural factors influence adherence to immunization against COVID-19 during the pandemic. Methodology: This integrative review was carried out following the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guideline. Using the PICO strategy, the search was conducted in the BIREME, PUBMED/MEDLINE, and BVS databases. It was conducted between October 2024 and November 2024. The inclusion criteria were publications from the last three (3) years, available in full, from any region, from peer-reviewed journals and that answered the question of this review. Duplicate studies and those that were not the main objective of this study were excluded, such as letters to the editor, editorial notes, projects, abstracts published in annals and texts that were not available in full or outside the established period. Results and Discussion: Numerous factors contribute to low population adherence to immunization against the coronavirus, the main factors being religious influence, disbelief in the effectiveness of the vaccine and the impact of political factors and fake news. Conclusion: Adherence to vaccination is subject to imagination and social mechanisms that decisively influence the propensity of a given community to get vaccinated or not; working on this issue is important to increase community adherence to the immunizations proposed by the government.
Downloads
References
Botelho, L. L. R.;·Cunha, C. C. A.; Macedo, M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade. Belo Horizonte, v.5, n. 11, p. 121-136, maio-ago. 2011.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. COVID-19. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/covid-19.
Callow, M. A.; Callow, D. D. Older Adults’ Behavior Intentions Once a COVID-19 Vaccine Becomes Available. Journal of Applied Gerontology, maio. 2021.
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648211019205.
Castro, R. Vacinas contra a Covid-19: o fim da pandemia? Physis [Internet]. 2021;31(1): e310100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312021310100
Costa, T.A; Silva, E.A. Narrativas antivacinas e a crise de confiança em algumas instituições. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação & Inovação em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, v. 16, n. 2, p. 281-297, abr.-jun. 2022.
Cronin, M. A.; George, E. (2020). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods,26(1). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507.
Domingues, C. M. A. S. Et Al. 46 anos do Programa Nacional de Imunizações: uma história repleta de conquistas e desafios a serem superados. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 36, suppl 2, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00222919.
Earnshaw V. A. et al. Crenças de conspiração COVID-19, comportamentos de saúde e apoio político. 2020 8 de outubro; 10(4):850-856. Translational Behavioral Medicine, v.10, n.4, 2020. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/tbm/article/10/4/850/5903782.
Filho, F. J. De A. Et Al. Fatores Que Influenciam Na Adesão De Idosos A Vacina Contra COVID-19: revisão de escopo. Nursing (São Paulo), v. 26, n. 304, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.36489/nursing.2023v26i304p9926-9931.
Galhardi, C. P. et al. Fake news e hesitação vacinal no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 27, n. 5, p. 1849-1858, maio 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022275.24092021.
Gatwood, J. Et Al. Factors influencing likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination: A survey of Tennessee adults. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, v. 78, n. 10, p. 879-889, 13 mar. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab099.
Jadher, P. Avaliação do impacto e da adesão da vacinação contra a COVID-19 no Brasil. 2023. Repositório Institucional UNB, 2022. Disponível em: http://www.rlbea.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/46551.
Junior, R. O. S. et al. Fatores de impacto na adesão de vacinação contra COVID-19 pelos profissionais de saúde: revisão integrativa. Revista de Casos e Consultoria, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 1, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/casoseconsultoria/article/view/28082.
Leite, E. S. F.; Martins, M. G.; Martins, C. M. C. R. Hesitação Vacinal e seus Fatores Associados no Contexto da Pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil. Cadernos de Prospecção, v. 16, n. 2, p. 484-502, 15 mar. 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v16i2.50880.
Nascimento, E S C; Carvalho F M; Gomes E. Relação entre fatores socioeconômicos e a pandemia da covid-19. Saúde e Sociedade [online]. v. 33, n. 1. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902024220248pt.
Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS). Entenda a infodemia e a desinformação na luta contra a COVID-19: kit de ferramentas de transformação digital. Washington: OPAS-OMS; 2020.
Silva G. M.; et al. COVID-19 vaccination challenges: from fake news to vaccine hesitancy. Cien Saude Colet. 2023 Mar;28(3):739-748. Portuguese, English. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232023283.09862022.
Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annual International Medicine, v. 169, n. 7, p.467-73, 2018.
Vilanova, M. Vacinas e imunidade, Revista Ciência Elementar, V8(2):021. Disponível em: Vacinas e imunidade - Revista de Ciência Elementar, 2020.
