Social reintegration of people with schizophrenia in the city of Palmas-TO: Local limitations and lessons from international models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v8i19.2753Keywords:
Social Reintegration, Schizophrenia, Mental Health, Public Policies, Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Palmas-TOAbstract
This article analyzes the policies and practices of social reintegration for individuals with schizophrenia in Palmas-TO, contrasting the local model with national and international references for psychosocial care. The research adopts a qualitative approach, of a descriptive and analytical nature, based on a narrative literature review and documentary research with the Municipal Health Department, according to the Access to Information Law. The study identifies a central gap: although the Psychosocial Care Network (RAPS) in Palmas plays a role in community-based care through its Psychosocial Care Centers, the documentary analysis confirmed the non-implementation of essential national instruments for rehabilitation, such as Therapeutic Residential Services (SRTs) and the Homecoming Program. This structural gap, combined with a shortage of professionals and weak intersectoral integration, diverges from international experiences (Housing First, IPS), which indicate the integration between health, housing, and work as fundamental for the success of inclusion. It is concluded that social reintegration in Palmas-TO is, in addition to a technical-assistance challenge, an ethical and political issue, requiring concrete investments so that care in freedom becomes an emancipatory and citizenship-oriented practice.
Downloads
References
AMARANTE, Paulo. Saúde mental e atenção psicossocial. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2007.
BARLATI, S.; NIBBIO, G.; VITA, A. Evidence-based psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: a critical review. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, v. 37, p. 131–139, 2024. DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000925.
BASAGLIA, Franco. A instituição negada: relato de um hospital psiquiátrico. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 2001.
BOND, Gary R.; DRAKE, Robert E.; BECKER, Deborah R. An update on Individual Placement and Support: Employment for people with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, v. 74, n. 2, p. 123–130, 2023. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200649.
CHIEN, W.; FAI, D.; BRESSINGTON, D.; MOU, H. Family-based interventions versus standard care for people with schizophrenia. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, v. 10, CD013541, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013541.pub2.
DEEGAN, Patricia E. Recovery and empowerment for people with psychiatric disabilities: visions, strategies, and programs. Boston: Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 1996.
FOUCAULT, Michel. História da loucura na idade clássica. Tradução de José Teixeira Coelho Netto. 7. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2019. [Obra original publicada em 1961].
HIRDES, Alice; et al. Autonomia e cidadania na reabilitação psicossocial: uma reflexão. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 14, n. 1, p. 5, 2009. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232009000100002.
JAMBAWO, S.; OWOLEWA, R.; JAMBAWO, T. The effectiveness of peer support on the recovery and empowerment of people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, v. 274, p. 270–279, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.006.
KILLASPY, H.; HARVEY, C.; BRASIER, C.; BROPHY, L.; ENNALS, P.; FLETCHER, J.; HAMILTON, B. Community-based social interventions for people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of recent evidence. World Psychiatry, v. 21, p. 56–70, 2022. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20940.
LAING, R. D. O eu dividido: um estudo existencial da sanidade e da loucura. Tradução de Áurea Brito Weissenberg. 6. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2017. [Obra original publicada em 1960].
LU, E.; CHENG, A.; TSANG, H.; CHEN, J.; LEUNG, S.; YIP, A.; et al. Psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, cognitive remediation training, and/or social skills training in combination for psychosocial functioning of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, v. 13, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899840.
MCDONAGH, M.; DANA, T.; KOPELOVICH, S.; MONROE-DEVITA, M.; BLAZINA, I.; BOUGATSOS, C.; et al. Psychosocial interventions for adults with schizophrenia: an overview and update of systematic reviews. Psychiatric Services, 2021. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000649.
SARACENO, Benedetto. Liberdade para viver: a residência como espaço de reabilitação psicossocial. In: KOVÁCS, Maria Júlia (Org.). Práticas institucionais e saúde mental. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 2001. p. 91–106.
SARACENO, Benedetto. Reabilitação psicossocial: uma estratégia para a Reforma Psiquiátrica. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2019.
SEIKKULA, Jaakko; ALAKARE, Birgitta. Open Dialogue Around the World: Dialogical practice in social and mental health care. London: Routledge, 2022.
SOLMI, M.; CROATTO, G.; PIVA, G.; ROSSON, S.; FUSAR-POLI, P.; RUBIO, J.; et al. Efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: systematic overview and quality appraisal of the meta-analytic evidence. Molecular Psychiatry, v. 28, p. 354–368, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01727-z.
SZASZ, Thomas. O mito da doença mental. Tradução de José Henrique da Silva Azevedo. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
YAMAGUCHI, Shuntaro; ITO, Hiroto; FUJITA, Eri. Digital mental health interventions in East Asia: current trends and challenges. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, v. 89, p. 103–118, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.103118.
YASUI, Silvio. Clínica peripatética: uma contribuição ao estudo da reforma psiquiátrica brasileira. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2010.
YASUI, Silvio; CAMPOS, Gastão Wagner de Souza. Reforma psiquiátrica e atenção psicossocial no Brasil: o protagonismo dos atores sociais. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 12, n. 1, p. 219–230, 2007. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232007000100025.
